understanding probability[was Re: war story: parallel(1) command]
Zbigniew Koziol
softquake-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sat Aug 3 18:02:22 UTC 2013
On 03/08/13 21:03, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
[...]
In general, people do not have an idea and imagination how to deal with
huge numbers. Bad physics teaching, I guess ;) (*)
Once a young engineer worked with me (in Canada). He desined a database
system that kept data from GPS related to vehicles mooving accross
USA/Canada roads with an accuracy to... 1 picometer. Well.. but accuracy
of GPS was of the order of 10 m. Good that he was so careful about
accuracy but bad for database performance.
How many atoms are in the Universe?
10^78 to 10^82
How that compares with 2^528 ?
(*) Physics is not and never was about numbers. It is about
understanding what is and what is not practically possible. With some
probability, of course ;) I am not a specialist on law excercised at
courts. But in case of doubt they are likely to ask an opinion of a
specialist.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20130803/e904a449/attachment.html>
More information about the Legacy
mailing list