Dspam effectiveness

[Marcelo Cavalcante]

2013/8/2 William Muriithi <william.muriithi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>

> Hi,
>
> Curious, anyone here have tried both dspam and SpamAssassin? Just curious
> if its worth trying dspam. From Wikipedia, it don't seem such effective,
> but have meet people who imply its far better than SpamAssassin.
>
> Haven't been following either through mailing list and there isn't a lot
> of recent discussion of the topic which is important considering dspam seem
> to have been sold a number of times.
>
> Would be great if you could share your opinion
>
> William
>
I'm not sure if you'll be able to find an effective solution against spam.

Everything is such a mess right now. I tried many solutions, incluind
SpamAssassin, but couldn't really be "free" of spams.

In fact, not even close to it.

Never tried dspam, so I can't tell about it, but I think it's hard to
believe that this would be a real solution against spam. :/

===================================================

Marcelo Cavalcante Rocha - Kalib


Pós-Graduando em Governança de Tecnologia da Informação - ESTÁCIO/FIC
Graduado em Sistemas de Informações - ESTÁCIO/FIC
Usuário Linux #407564 | Usuário Asterisk #1148
Fortaleza - Ceará - Brazil
Celular: +55 085 87620983
Certificações: ITIL
V3<http://www.itil-officialsite.com/Qualifications/ITILV3QualificationLevels/ITILV3FoundationQualificationinITServiceManagement.aspx>
 | CSM <http://www.scrumalliance.org/> | LPI-C1 <http://www.lpi.org/> |
LPI-C2 <http://www.lpi.org/> | LPI-C3 <http://www.lpi.org/> | Novell
CLA<http://www.novell.com/training/certinfo/cla/>
Minha Pessoa: Blog <http://www.marcelocavalcante.net>
Projetos: Tux-CE <http://www.tux-ce.org> |
Archlinux-br<http://www.archlinux-br.org>
 | Chakra <http://www.chakra-project.org/> | KDE Brasil <http://br.kde.org>
 | TLUG <http://gtalug.org/wiki/Main_Page> |
PUG-CE<http://pug-ce.python.org.br/blog/>

===================================================


Proteja meu endereço como estou protegendo o seu.
Não revele e-mail dos correspondentes: use Cco (Copia Carbonada Oculta).
Retire os endereços antes de reenviar. Dificulte assim a
disseminação de vírus e spam.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20130802/6244274e/attachment.html>