Ever came across a case where cmod 777 was a valid solution

Lennart Sorensen lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Fri Mar 9 19:14:03 UTC 2012


On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:43:40PM -0500, William Muriithi wrote:
> Afternoon,
> 
> Over time, I have came across cases where someone has "fixed" a
> problem or suggested changing file permission to 777 and have always
> ended up ranting about it.  That got me thinking today, could there be
> a solution that would genuinely need read, write and execute
> permission for user, group and others?  I sincerely can not think of
> any and wonder if any of us here have come across such a case.
> 
> Please educate me.

Possibly for something like /dev/null

And as someone else said, if the sticky bit is set as well, then OK.
Otherwise it is always solving the problem in the wrong way.

-- 
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list