server distros

Lennart Sorensen lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Tue Mar 6 17:13:02 UTC 2012


On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:51:29AM -0500, Peter King wrote:
> For a server? OpenBSD. Seriously secure, lovely network stack, very
> well-maintained upgrades, in widespread use.

Secure yes
Nice network stack, yes
Well maintained, well reasonably
Widespread use, probably not that much anymore

Of course I personally would add to that (and I have very much used it):

Painful user space
Painful package management
Seriously outdated hardware support.

Of course I do tend to expect perfection, and never accept "that's how
we have always done it" as a reason to continue to do anything.

Too bad Debian only has a freebsd and netbsd version, not openbsd,
otherwise you could at least fix two of the three problems.

-- 
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list