Fedora 16 and Gnome 3 Tested and Reviewed

Wed Apr 4 16:08:30 UTC 2012

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Kevin Cozens <kevin-4dS5u2o1hCn3fQ9qLvQP4Q at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Apologies. Sending this message one last time with the proper subject line.
>
> -----
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Ivan Avery Frey
>>
>> http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fedora-16-gnome-3-review,3155.html
>
>
> Thank you for the link. It was a good review. The more I read about Gnome 3
> the less I am inclined to use it. I don't want to "upgrade" my machine to a
> version of distro that uses it and have to spend time customizing it to get
> it to where it is close to what I am used to under Gnome 2.
>

As has been widely and thoroughly reported, Gnome3 comes with a Gnome
Classic alternative that can be selected from the login screen. It is
identical to Gnome 2.x. There is no need for the hysterical reactions
people are having to Gnome 3, it is entirely optional.

-- 
Thomas Milne
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists