External USB Blu-Ray drives under Linux?

ted leslie ted.leslie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sun Mar 20 15:12:47 UTC 2011


bluray not reliable? so you need far more then 100year retention? what
are you doing that needs that?
I still have cd's from '88 that are good , and some that are totally
screwed, but I believe a good disc like a panny BD
could get 100years of life even in poor storage env. A 50gb BD will
also be 0.50 in time (couple of years), but then they have
300gb ones on the way to (so have to buy a new drive), but BD is
likely to be a standard for reading for a while, i.e.
CD will probably have a production life of 40-50years, so i could see
BD devices still sold in 2040+. (or at least will read BD, and 1tb BD
or whatever as
time goes on).

tl

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:37 AM,  <phiscock-g851W1bGYuGnS0EtXVNi6w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:41:10PM -0400, phiscock-g851W1bGYuGnS0EtXVNi6w at public.gmane.org wrote:
>>> Folks -
>>>
>>> I've outgrown by DVD storage, so I'm considering upgrading to an
>>> external
>>> USB connected Blu-Ray burner. Using an external USB-connected hard drive
>>> works great on this Suse Linux box, so I'm hoping there is a similar
>>> solution for Blu-Ray.
>>>
>>> Any comments on the feasibility of this? Does it require special
>>> software
>>> or can you simply mount the drive and copy to it?
>>>
>>> Any advice would be appreciated. Here's the description of this system:
>>>
>>> cat /etc/issue
>>> Welcome to openSUSE 10.3 (i586) - Kernel \r (\l).
>>>
>>> cat /proc/version
>>> Linux version 2.6.22.19-0.4-default (geeko at buildhost) (gcc version 4.2.1
>>> (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP 2009-08-14 02:09:16 +0200
>>>
>>> Peter
>>
>> I'm sure you did the math... but, isn't 3TB harddisk cheaper?  You get
>> those external dock, and swap the harddisk like you currently do with
>> DVD.
>> --
>> William
>> --
> Yeah, that may be the way to go. On further research, Blu-Ray appears not
> to be all that reliable for archival storage. Apparently the limiting
> factor with hard drives is that the lubrication fails after a year or so
> of sitting on the shelf, so you have to use a HD to keep it working.
>
> Hard drive is definitely the way to go for local backup. Removeable hard
> drive might also be the best alternative for off-site backup. I'm also
> going to look at solid state.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list