possible router platforms
Walter Dnes
waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org
Sun Jul 17 04:13:20 UTC 2011
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 03:04:52PM -0400, James Knott wrote
> Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:39:01PM -0400, James Knott wrote
> >
> >
> >> How many people have an internet connection that's better than 100
> >> Mb/s? I expect many could get by with a 10 Mb NIC.
> >>
> > If you only have one computer, yes. But if you have more than one
> > machine, and want to transfer files between them, a gigabit connection
> > is nice.
> >
> >
>
> Then you'd need Gb NICs on those computers. The NIC on the router is
> irrelevant for local traffic. It's only when you connect to the
> internet or another network that you'd pass through the router.
I have only 1 router/modem, with 3 machines behind it. In addition to
NATing my internet connection, the router/modem also handles traffic
between my machines...
_____________ ___
| machine A |- |R|
------------- \ |O|
_____________ ---|U| internet
| machine B |-----|T|==========>
------------- ___|E|
_____________ / |R|
| machine C |- ---
-------------
Connecting to the internet uses the same cat5 cable and jacks and NIC
as connecting to one of the other machines behind the router. What am I
missing? Is there really an money saved by having 1 Gbit connections
locally and 10 or 100 megabits on the internet side?
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list