AMD vs. nVidia binary driver?

Tyler Aviss tjaviss-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Fri Jan 21 02:12:09 UTC 2011


Last time I used the ATI installer it was fairly convenient, it even has an
gui installer for if it's used in X.
On 2011-01-20 6:07 PM, "William Park" <opengeometry-FFYn/CNdgSA at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I only have nVidia graphic cards, and I use their binary drivers. In fact,

> installing Kernel, nVidia, and VirtualBox (in that order) has become sort
of
> habit.
>
> How are things on AMD side? Are ATI binary drivers simple to install, like

> nVidia? I'm, of course, assuming that ATI binary driver is better than
> open-source one.
> --
> William
>
>
>
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20110120/e3f5f75d/attachment.html>


More information about the Legacy mailing list