Why I've switched to Opera
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Tue Feb 22 18:32:59 UTC 2011
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:29:06PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:45:36AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote
>
> > No pure 64bit firefox? Really?
>
> Because the post I was replying to said that I was comparing
> source-code versus compiled executable, I deliberately chose
> firefox-bin. The Gentoo ebuild, at least, appears to require 32-bit
> compatability support in a 64-bit install. That's not "pure 64-bit" as
> far as I'm concerned. Do you have 32-bit multilib support enabled?
> Here's what I got when trying to emerge firefox-bin in a 64-bit
> environment with no 32-bit multilib support...
Some plugins may still be 32bit, although I am not sure I have any of
those installed anymore.
> =====================================================================
> [i3][root][~] emerge -pv firefox-bin
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "firefox-bin" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - www-client/firefox-bin-3.6.13 (masked by: package.mask)
> /usr/portage/profiles/features/64bit-native/package.mask:
> # AMD64 Team <amd64-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A at public.gmane.org>
> # Mask packages that rely on amd64 multilib
>
> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge
> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> =====================================================================
The debian package for firefox does not depend on any 32bit lib support,
which to me means it is a pure 64bit package these days.
--
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list