Comments on another CRTC draft submission
D. Hugh Redelmeier
hugh-pmF8o41NoarQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org
Mon Mar 9 17:46:27 UTC 2009
| From: Walter Dnes <waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org>
| http://clients.teksavvy.com/~walterdnes/crtc.txt
I'm reading your submission and nothing else. Of course that is a
lazy approach that could be improved.
I agree with the vast majority of what you said.
| Page 4 Peter Grant's numbers are no longer valid
I think that arguing that the figures are wrong isn't important. The
principles are not affected by smallish quantitative differences.
Worse, your argument butresses the idea that network neutrality is
bad.
| I consulted Bell's web page on the evening of March
| 4, 2008, to check their rates.
I bet that was this year, not last year.
| I worry about Bell and other major ISPs having a conflict of interest.
Amen. But Rogers is probably worse. No, I guess they all are trying
the same businesses with different levels of success.
| 1) Commission-approved, transparent, and equitable network management
| 2) Outside of item 1), no blocking/slowing of traffic, except where
| required by Canadian federal legislation or an order by a court of
| competent jurisdiction
Actually, one threat is subtly different: speeding up preferred
traffic. Is that different from slowing other traffic? (You and I
would say yes, but proponents would try to argue the opposite.)
And yet, forbidding speeding up traffic would seem to prevent good
engineering practice such as caches.
| The submission by the CBC does raise the issue of handling
| millions of people simultaneously wanting to view live streaming video
| of news events. The submission used the examples of the US 2008
| election and US President Obama's inauguration. CBC's internet
| facilities were overloaded as were portions of the internet. The
| problem is that streaming 1 megabit per second to 5 million simultaneous
| connections requires 5 terabits per second of throughput! Let's just
| say "that does not scale". Have we run into a "scarcity", requiring
| CRTC regulation? The answer is "NO".
|
| There is a network protocol designed for just this situation. It is
| called "multicast".
This would also be a good place to point out: the CBC should *want*
"piracy" since it spreads their message without having to provide the
bandwidth.
Seriously: thinking of new problems in old ways is limiting. What is
called "piracy" is an opportunity for new models as well as a threat
to old ones.
Example: CBC radio suffers from too few listeners and yet tries to
control copies of its shows (only some are available as podcasts and
only for a limited time).
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list