Linux desktop sluggish over time

phiscock-g851W1bGYuGnS0EtXVNi6w at public.gmane.org phiscock-g851W1bGYuGnS0EtXVNi6w at public.gmane.org
Fri Jun 5 18:29:03 UTC 2009


Not a problem on this Suse Linux system, version 10.1 (I think).
Peter

> Hello,
>
> Considering my experience with Linux this seems to be a problem a should
> have fixed by now, but it's an problem I'm growing particularly annoyed
> with.
>
> I notice that over time Linux desktops I use tend to get sluggish. I
> know this is true for at least Ubuntu and Fedorah. I don't remember
> feeling it as much on Debian, but it's been a while.
>
> Anyway, here goes. Sometimes I leave my home Ubuntu machine on for a
> while; I'm talking like 2-3 weeks, maybe more. Sometimes I run
> CPU-intensive apps for a few hours, then leave it idle for days. It just
> seems like over time, the machine gets increasingly unresponsive. After
> rebooting and opening up Thunderbird, the new message window pops up
> right away. After several weeks it takes twice the amount of time or
> more. And, while I thought maybe the GUI/X/Video Driver (nVidia Quadro
> NVS 290) might be to blame, the sluggishness is noticeable even when I
> ssh into my machine from outside.. so it's not just GUI response time.
> But sometimes the problem is less noticeable if I restart X, so ..
>
> We're talking about a new Intel Core 2 Duo, 3.0 GHz with 4 GB of RAM.
>
> For a while I suspected Gnome was the culprit. Could it be? This seems
> way less noticeable when I use fluxbox, but alas, I need a user-friendly
> desktop for the girlfriend.
>
> I suspect this may be due to processes left open that consume most of
> memory but the problem persists even after killing some of those large
> processes.
>
> I know for a fact that Ubuntu comes with a lot of little trinkets that
> are spiffy and supposed to make "Linux easier to use" or more modern but
> sometimes they can slow the machine down. Compiz, for example, is a
> culprit. Pulseaudio too. *But* even after removing these unneeded apps
> the problem still happens.
>
> So, to my question... does anybody know what is going on here and has
> been through similar trouble? I suspect that it is memory/virtual memory
> related.. like, over time the OS doesn't handle memory management as
> well by default, but if I set a few flags this will all magically
> change. I don't want to take the easy way out and just reboot; I want to
> understand what the problem is.
>
> Linux's performance is one of the main reasons I initially ditched
> Windows (don't worry, there have been a lot of reasons since that have
> made me stick with it), and now it seems like many distros are going the
> "unneeded bloat" route... it makes me sad. I just hope it -- meaning my
> particular problem -- can be fixed.
>
> Thanks,
> Marc
>
> --
> Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work. Practice
> is when something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine
> theory and practice: Nothing works and they don't know why.
>    -- Anonymous
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>


-- 
Peter Hiscocks
Syscomp Electronic Design Limited, Toronto
http://www.syscompdesign.com
USB Oscilloscope and Waveform Generator
647-839-0325

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list