Second draft of RFI response

[Kyle O'Donnell]

Great Document.  Thanks for taking the time to write it.

Here are some comments:

Q2 As stated above, we can demonstrate that free-proprietary software
– while serving some useful purposes – is rarely useful in production
environments. We are not aware of any legally acquired
free-proprietary software that is useful for commercial production
environments without requiring an upgrade to a paid version.

I would leave this statement out, as it is speculative ("We are not
aware"), and it may negatively influence someone's opinion on
"free-proprietary software"

Q2.1 typo:
... if high quality Canadian SSERVICE providers are prepared to support it.

Q3.8 Is the software included in the repositories of major Linux distributions?
I would change 'Linux' to 'open source operating systems' maybe add
'such as Linux'.

--kyleo

On 2/19/09, Evan Leibovitch <evan-ieNeDk6JonTYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dmqxr8w_24g9jf57kn
>
> I've tried to incorporate many of the responses that I have
> (thankfully!) received.
> Any other comments are welcome, but it needs to be sent today.
>
> - Evan
>
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists