Delayed messages
JoeHill
joehill-R6A+fiHC8nRWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
Sat Apr 11 19:42:04 UTC 2009
James Knott wrote:
> John McGregor wrote:
> > James Knott wrote:
> >> One thing I've noticed in the recent discussions is that some messages
> >> are significantly delayed. In one example, a message I had sent last
> >> night arrived this morning, over 12 hours later. Here's a few of the
> >> header lines:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> I have only noticed this behaviour with the TLUG list and it doesn't
> >> happen with all messages.
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> > I've noticed a general slowdown of email over the last week as well.
> > It may be just coincidence, but Rogers has been rolling out a new
> > antivirus solution to its Windows customers since the beginning of
> > April and certainly our mail would have to traverse those servers.
> >
>
> Wouldn't that AV software be installed on the user's computer and not
> the servers?
Not necessarily. When I was with Sympatico they put in a predictably bad system
for filtering viruses and such at the server level. It very badly fuxored my
e-mail because it added all kinds of non-compliant headers that Spamassassin
really hated.
> Also, wouldn't that affect all email, and not just TLUG?
In my case, it was only certain lists that were affected: those that used
Spamassassin to filter mail. A few lists started dropping my mails, especially
those on Sourceforge.
> As the headers I included showed, it was about 12 hours from when that
> other server to when Rogers received it. So, the delay is apparently
> outside of Rogers.
--
J
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list