scary things at CRTC

[James Knott]

Scott Elcomb wrote:
> I'll reply to this and then to Giles' message.  I'll not add anything
> further to this thread after that.
>
> I agree with Dave and don't see any reason to disagree with you except
> for the "anti-science hogwash."  It's not anti-science at all, in fact
> it's proof.
>
> All science comes down to is this:  A theory is valid and acceptable
> until a better theory comes along.  This requires a certain amount of
> faith.  Consider that we, as a species, are still struggling with very
> difficult concepts.  What is thought?  Why can we question and
> investigate things -- curiosities, origins, and even existence itself.
>  Science is great (I love it anyway) but it's hardly complete.
>
> As a person who's wanted to "be a scientist" since I was I child
> (about 7yrs old) I don't see any conflict between these points of
> view.
>
>   
Theories are based on solid evidence to support them.  As time goes on,
the evidence gets better the theory updated.


-- 
Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists