scary things at CRTC

Dave Germiquet davegermiquet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Wed Apr 8 17:01:14 UTC 2009


Actually it depends on what you want to believe. There are facts in
the bible that you can go out and prove. Christians call the people
who prove the bible Apologetics.

I personally don't know much about the fact, but there are facts of
people, places, and history that is in the bible.

It all stems from which source or original source on the basis of your faith.

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 2009-04-08, Thomas Milne <tbrucemilne-TcoXwbchSccMMYnvST3LeUB+6BGkLq7r at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On 2009-04-08, Lennart Sorensen <lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:10:16AM -0400, Madison Kelly wrote:
>>>>> To me, I see anyone who dismisses the beliefs, or lack thereof, of
>>>>> others with simple adjectives like "insane" as being equal foolish and
>>>>> close-minded.
>>>>
>>>> Well perhaps.
>>>
>>> Personally, I think books are a quick excuse for people too lazy to
>>> figure out how the world works for themselves.  Much easier to read
>>> and go by faith rather than to actually try to figure things out one's
>>> self.
>>>
>>> I also think science is being used as a means to control people who
>>> are willing to put their trust in faith in scientists.  I prefer
>>> people to think for themselves, but popular science seems to generally
>>> discourage that, although I am sure there are some exceptions.  I
>>> don't see many cases of this; people seem way more inclined to just
>>> trust in whatever they heard some scientist said than to do any
>>> verification themselves.
>>>
>>> Anyone without an irony-meter should probably ignore this...
>>
>> You flatter yourself. Just because you replaced a bunch of words with
>> their opposite doesn't make it 'irony'. Your attempt at cleverness
>> assumes that 'science' and 'religion' are equal in terms of faith,
>> they are certainly not.
>
> Flattery gets you nowhere.
>
> Throwing insults doesn't get people very far, either, and that's what
> this thread has devolved into.
> --
> http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>



-- 



Dave Germiquet
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list