Debian Lenny and release dates

[JoeHill]

Lennart Sorensen wrote: 

> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:20:23AM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
> > 
> > Saw this article just now:
> > 
> > http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=3312
> > 
> > Not really concerned that 'Debian is in trouble', but I am curious about how
> > the releases work.  
> 
> Once in a while, debian manages to get the critical bug count very low,
> and any remaining packages with bugs that are not that important are
> kicked out of the release.  Then the release is declared stable, and the
> previous stable release is named old-stable.  A new testing release (The
> next one I believe is to be named Squeeze or something like that) is
> then named based on the new stable release.  Lots of tested packages
> without known bugs in unstable are then let in to testing, and
> development continues for a few more years until once again a stable
> release happens.  In the past there was no testing, and the elimination
> of bugs had to happen in unstable until it was in a state that could be
> released.  That was hard and painful and held up new development.  I
> think testing started after the release of 2.2.
> 
> > If I am running Lenny, and want to maintain a system that always has
> > relatively up to date software (not necessarily bleeding edge), what is the
> > process to follow when Lenny finally is finally released? Is that a
> > 'dist-upgrade', or is that only for going, say, from Lenny to Sid?  
> 
> dist-upgrade is the only proper way to ever upgrade.  The upgrade option
> is pretty much useless as it refuses to install anything new or remove
> anything old, which during development is often necesary.  The only
> place plain upgrade tends to work is getting security updates on a
> stable release.

But when is it that a dist-upgrade is performed? 

...a bright star in the East?

...a Wizard comes to my house and gives me a scroll?

Would I then be running 'Squeeze'?

> Oh and going to Sid should only be done by those that know what they are
> doing, since Sid is the unstable development branch.  Sid is never going
> to be a stable release.  After all Sid was the kid in Toy Story that
> tortured and broke all the toys.

Sid I get, not sure how they arrived at 'Lenny'. He wasn't exactly a central
character ;)
 
> > Sorry if I sound thick, but I've been doing clean installs of Mandriva
> > releases every year or so for a long time, having trouble wrapping my head
> > around this new scheme.  
> 
> New scheme?  It's been going on this way for well over a decade.

New to _me_ :-) Like I say, I've been doing things a very different way from
the Debian Way.

-- 
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists