Partitioning on RHEL
Ansar Mohammed
ansarm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sat Oct 11 06:07:27 UTC 2008
My 2c
1. If you have six hard disks, consider raid 1+0. (especially on a db
server)
2. If you have an instance where you need to page 10gb of memory to disk, it
probably means you have other, bigger issues. i.e what value does a 10gb
swap partition/file give you? That 2xRAM theory was created 10-12 years ago
when we had 8-32MB RAM on a system.
3. Swap files are as of 2.6 as fast as swap partitions and they can be moved
around.
4. Are you running the x64 edition of RHEL?
From: owner-tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org [mailto:owner-tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Asaf Maruf
Sent: October 10, 2008 11:19 AM
To: tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org
Subject: [TLUG]: Partitioning on RHEL
Hello
I have a requirement to setup a Dell server with RHEL 5 and Oracle. The
server has six hard disks configured as RAID 1.
The server has 8GB of physical RAM. The disk size of each RAID 1 is 139GB
I am recommending the following partition sizes and swap size.
/ 10GB
/boot 100-500MB
/var 2GB
/opt 2GB
swap 10GB
I have calculated swap size using the following formula:
Upto 2GB RAM ----> double the swap size ---> 4GB
Add the remaining 6GB for a total swap size of 10GB
Just need confirmation if this is an adequate partitioning scheme for an
Oracle database server running on Linux.
Thank you in advance.
Asaf Maruf
--
"I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much
more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be
wrong." - Richard P. Feynman
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list