LGPL Version Exclusivity (Was: Releasing software under both LGPL 2.1 & 3 - A good idea?)

[Scott Elcomb]

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:14 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier <hugh-pmF8o41NoarQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> | From: Scott Elcomb <psema4-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
>
> | Yeah.  My reading is that this option should not be a XOR operation.
> | The EFF suggests otherwise.  :S
>
> Probably not the EFF.  Do you meand FSF?

Bleh.  Yes, you're right.  My bad.

> If you think about the legal text the way a programmer thinks about a
> program, I suspect you will understand and even accept what they are
> saying.
>
> Yes, details matter.  In law and code.

Will consider.  Thanks.  :-)

-- 
  Scott Elcomb
  http://www.psema4.com/
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists