MLPPP twarts Bell throttling?

[Tom Low-Shang]

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:36:55PM -0400, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> According to the first DSLreports forum entry on this thread, ML PPP 
> avoids Bell throttling.
> 
> Has anyone tried this?  Do the traditional Linux PPPoE stacks support ML 
> PPP?  Do your ISPs support it?
> 
> Intriguing, but I have not done any investigation.

MLPPP does work but I'm only using it on a single link, so it will be
easy for the throttling boxes to defeat. MLPPP just moves the data a few
bytes. Actually using multiple links will make it harder to defeat
according to some opinions. I'm using it on a stock Debian system with
texsavvy.com

I agree with Jamon that we should not have to resort these measures.

-- 
Tom Low-Shang
JID tlow-/eSpBmjxGS4dnm+yROfE0A at public.gmane.org
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists