MLPPP twarts Bell throttling?
tlow-AZu5J0u3PMt/LtIqEKMDMfN90d+awN/n at public.gmane.org
Wed Jul 2 20:23:26 UTC 2008
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:36:55PM -0400, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> According to the first DSLreports forum entry on this thread, ML PPP
> avoids Bell throttling.
> Has anyone tried this? Do the traditional Linux PPPoE stacks support ML
> PPP? Do your ISPs support it?
> Intriguing, but I have not done any investigation.
MLPPP does work but I'm only using it on a single link, so it will be
easy for the throttling boxes to defeat. MLPPP just moves the data a few
bytes. Actually using multiple links will make it harder to defeat
according to some opinions. I'm using it on a stock Debian system with
I agree with Jamon that we should not have to resort these measures.
JID tlow-/eSpBmjxGS4dnm+yROfE0A at public.gmane.org
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy