Wireless Office

Scott Sullivan scott-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org
Mon Dec 29 22:13:57 UTC 2008

No office is trully safe when there is Van Eck phreaking [1].

What it comes down to is what you consider a reasonable risk Vs. gain. 
If this is a home office or small business office, then the risk could 
be "acceptable" to those it matters too. If this was a bank, then dear 
god I know their smarter then to use anything wireless, they have enough 
troubles with physical keyloggers popping up everywhere.

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Eck_phreaking

James Knott wrote:
> Zbigniew Koziol wrote:
>> In most cases it does not matter but... in general, the idea of
>> wireless office is sick. Because of security. Everyone around can
>> monitor all office activity and steal data.
> That's why you use something called "encryption".  WPA2 encryption has
> not been broken and is very secure.  Do not use WEP and use plain WPA,
> if you can't do WPA2.  Many WiFi routers can be configured to work with
> both WPA & WPA2, depending on what the computer is capable of.  Linux,
> Vista, XP SP3 can do WPA2.  XP SP2 can only do WPA.
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists

More information about the Legacy mailing list