ECMAScript ("Javascript") Version 4 - FALSE ALARM
Walter Dnes
waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org
Wed Oct 31 11:31:57 UTC 2007
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:14:29PM +0000, Christopher Browne wrote
> With the widespread popularity of JavaScript-based application
> frameworks, people *MUST* have support for it in their browsers in
> order to be able to use the web-based services that they are CHOOSING
> to use.
s/JavaScript-based application/Active-X on IE running on Windows/
At some point, you have to decide that increased whizbang features are
not worth the increased security problems. It's just a question of
where you draw the line.
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org> In linux /sbin/init is Job #1
Q. Mr. Ghandi, what do you think of Microsoft security?
A. I think it would be a good idea.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list