More on Monsoon Multimedia

Tyler Aviss tjaviss-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Mon Oct 15 18:36:28 UTC 2007


Sounds like the way it should be to me. I don't know if their rep's
attitude was representative of the entire company, but the overall
impression he gave me was that the company was willing to attack
legitimate investigation of their product as opposed to dealing with
them in an amicable manner to address the issues presented.

When presented with an issue, some companies negotiate, some defend,
and some attack... and in the early stages monsoon seemed to be doing
a little of both attack/defend which doesn't do much for their
reputation with me.

On 10/15/07, JoeHill <joehill-R6A+fiHC8nRWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> Saw this on Linux.com:
>
> Daniel B. Ravicher, legal director of the Software Freedom Law Center:
>
> "I can confirm that we are discussing settlement," Ravicher says, "but --
> contrary to what many in the press seem to believe -- no agreement has been
> reached. Simply coming into compliance now is not sufficient to settle the
> matter, because that would mean anyone can violate the license until caught,
> because the only punishment would be to come into compliance."
>
> Them's fightin' words ;)
>
> Link:
>
> http://www.linux.com/feature/119439
>
> --
> JoeHill
> ++++++++++++++++++++
>  Bender: Stay away from our women. You got metal fever, baby, metal fever!
>
>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list