re-thinking LUGs and early planning for the first Canadian LUG summit

Lennart Sorensen lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Thu Nov 8 15:41:29 UTC 2007


On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:38:00PM -0500, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> If Lennart is right and most open source "advocates" can't (or don't
> care to) see past their immediate circle, then that's a reality we may
> need to deal with. Maybe LUGs will forever be little more than
> personal-level self help, leaving it to vendors to do the lobbying and
> advocacy. To me this would be a wasted opportunity, but I prefer to be
> optimistic and hope that at least some segment of the community cares
> about a bigger picture.

People are lazy right?  Isn't that part of the reason to have open
source so that you can reuse code rather than having to write it all
again each time? :)

It is certainly more efficient use of resources to have open source.
Those that can write code (and want to) do so, and those that can't
don't (or shouldn't).

--
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list