Ethernet autonegotiate vs forcing full speed
Neil Watson
tlug-neil-8agRmHhQ+n2CxnSzwYWP7Q at public.gmane.org
Fri May 25 15:06:42 UTC 2007
There is debate at work regarding network Ethernet auto-negotiation.
I'm the newcomer. Historically they say they had problems with auto-neg
and their cisco gear (catalist) and now manually set all switch ports
and server NICs to full/full. I've never heard of such a policy. It
seems to make extra work for all parties since all gear defaults to
auto/auto. Additionally, I spent some time trouble shooting a Linux
server that I had newly configured for bonding. I could not force the
NICs to full/full. When I had the cisco guy change the switch ports to
auto/auto the bonding worked instantly.
Should this manual configuration of full/full be the exception or the
rule?
--
Neil Watson | Debian Linux
System Administrator | Uptime 21 days
http://watson-wilson.ca
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list