OT: Internet connectivity
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Thu May 10 13:38:47 UTC 2007
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:37:14PM -0400, Michael MacLeod wrote:
> I have Sympatico and find it much more reliable than Rogers. Go
> figure. Basically, there's no way to know which will be better until
> you try them both. Service levels vary so much depending on the area
> and infrastructure in your area. Basically, while Rogers may be
> terrific in one neighborhood, Sympatico is better in another.
Microsoft mail system. Enough said. Sympatico billing department might
also be worth thinking about. Not a good thought.
> Also, service levels change as money gets spent on the infrastructure.
> Where I live used to have TERRIBLE service from Sympatico. Rogers was
> certainly superior. Then Bell ripped out the 30 or 40 year old phone
> lines and laid down fiber all over the area. Now I'm with Bell and
> it's fantastic. Haven't had a problem for months. Much faster now too.
Although that probably means you could go with a cheaper DSL ISP and get
even better service for less money now that the DSL infastructure is
working right.
--
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list