If Microsoft created vi

[James Knott]

David J Patrick wrote:
> On 17/03/07, R.R. <rrod-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Haha, that made my day :)
>>
>> Oh, and pico/nano is better IMO.
>
> no, not better, simpler.
> vim, once mastered, is arguably the fastest possible text editing
> environment, where emacs is perhaps the richest text editing
> environment. pico and nano are simple less featured, and therefor less
> confusing.
>
> better, and/or worse, are entirely subjective.
> djp
>
Emacs is a text editor too???   ;-)

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists