The case against OLPC?
Mel Wilson
mwilson-4YeSL8/OYKRWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
Fri Dec 7 17:08:26 UTC 2007
Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> I usually think John Dvorak is a headline-grabbing crank, but this
> latest column rang true with sentiments that simply won't leave my head.
>
> Isn't the whole idea of "let's give the developing world little
> computers" a kind of rich-person's feel-good thinking, when so much of
> the world doesn't even have enough to eat?
>
> Is the OLPC going to fix literacy rates without teachers or books?
Part of the business case for OLPC is that it replaces the printing
and distribution of textbooks. The cost of an XO is equivalent to the
cost of providing textbooks for four years or so. There are extra
benefits like the ability to distribute up-to-date e-texts through the
network without worrying about inventory of books, inventory of
obsolete books, etc.
> IMO Dvorak goes too far in calling the OLPC little more than an
> ad-delivery device,
Hardly blame him. That's the North American model for about every
personal computer there is.
Mel.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list