cat 5 & electrical

[chris-n/jUll39koHNgV/OU4+dkA at public.gmane.org]

Robert Brockway writes: 

> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Lennart Sorensen wrote: 
> 
>> Why Cat5?  You need 5e or 6 to run gigabit.  Why would you wire with
>> less than 5e anymore?
> 
> Often when people say "Cat5" these days they are referringh to Cat5e 
> because the original Cat5 is so bad.  I think that is what is happening 
> here.

Yeah, I was generically referring to it as cat 5. I think there is an E 
after the 5. I'll check when I'm back from holidaying. Thanks. 

Chris 

> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Rob 
> 
> -- 
> "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine..."
> 	-- RFC 1925 "The Twelve Networking Truths"
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
 

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists