Hardware experiences?

Tim Writer tim-s/rLXaiAEBtBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Tue Sep 12 04:48:40 UTC 2006


Evan Leibovitch <evan-ieNeDk6JonTYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org> writes:

> Peter King wrote:
> > I'm thinking of getting a new machine -- so I'm interested in any
> > Linux war stories, good or bad, with the following hardware:
> >
> >   AMD Athlon 64 X2 (dual core)
> >
> 
> A 64-bit OS is good. If this is for a desktop, keep in mind that the Adobe
> Flash player and the Windows media codecs don't work under 64-bit. I have
> no idea if they work on 64-bit hardware running a 32-bit OS.

Running 32 bit Linux on 64 bit hardware is equivalent (in terms of
application compatibility) to runing 32 bit Linux on 32 bit hardware. This
is why many people suggest that 32 bit Linux is a safe choice for 64 bit
systems.  Running 32 bit applications on 64 bit Linux is a different story.

-- 
tim writer <tim-s/rLXaiAEBtBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org>                                  starnix inc.
647.722.5301                                      toronto, ontario, canada
http://www.starnix.com              professional linux services & products
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list