How much swap?

ted leslie tleslie-RBVUpeUoHUc at public.gmane.org
Thu Oct 26 14:44:34 UTC 2006


this was only to address the issue that maybe some kernels would object
to the absence of swap, and this would trick it.
if one is sure that turing vm off in their particular kernel version
is ok, then yep, no point in doing below.

-tl


On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 09:58 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:42:09AM -0400, ted leslie wrote:
> > i have lately set up some systems with 10-12-16 GB of ram and even
> > embarking on larger.
> > SUSE 10  seems to put the swap at 2GB (i guess as a max) once you are up
> > to these type of RAM numbers (this is in its standard install
> > configuration recommendation).
> > So I am thinking that there is generally never a need to go more the 2GB
> > of HD swap? (at least in Novell's opinion)
> > Now with ram being so darn cheap, how about a 16 GB system,
> > but put 2GB of that into a RAM based FS and mount that as your SWAP :)
> > kinda defeats the purpose, but at least Linux will have its swap
> > space :)
> 
> Swapping to ram would be completely pointless and rather stupid.
> Mouting tmp in ram using tmpfs makes perfectly good sense though.  Why
> copy stuff from one part of ram to another through multiple layers of
> block emulation for no useful purpose?
> 
> --
> Len Sorensen
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
> 

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list