Rogers and BitTorrent: another datapoint
Ivan Avery Frey
ivan.frey-H217xnMUJC0sA/PxXw9srA at public.gmane.org
Thu Oct 26 13:03:01 UTC 2006
D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> I've just finished downloading Fedora Core 6 for x86_64 and i386. The
> former I downloaded the my Rogers Extreme connection, the latter through
> my ADSL connection.
>
> The ADSL connection is pretty bad: I'm far enough from the CO that they've
> throttled it way down to make it reliable.
>
> Even so, both downloards took about the same time (~36 hours, if I
> remember correctly). True, the ADSL's dowload was about 10% smaller).
> Both times seem pretty bad.
>
> I don't know what to do about Rogers and Bit Torrent. They advertised a
> faster connection if I paid $100 for the modem. But when it matters, it
> is actually slower. Much slower. I wonder if there is a lawsuit waiting
> to happen.
They could argue that you can't setup your computer like a server. When you're
filesharing technically your computer is also a server.
Have you tried switching the ports your client uses? Or does Rogers scan all
ports for bittorrent traffic.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list