Rogers and BitTorrent: another datapoint

Ivan Avery Frey ivan.frey-H217xnMUJC0sA/PxXw9srA at public.gmane.org
Thu Oct 26 13:03:01 UTC 2006


D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> I've just finished downloading Fedora Core 6 for x86_64 and i386.  The 
> former I downloaded the my Rogers Extreme connection, the latter through 
> my ADSL connection.
> 
> The ADSL connection is pretty bad: I'm far enough from the CO that they've 
> throttled it way down to make it reliable.
> 
> Even so, both downloards took about the same time (~36 hours, if I 
> remember correctly).  True, the ADSL's dowload was about 10% smaller).  
> Both times seem pretty bad.
> 
> I don't know what to do about Rogers and Bit Torrent.  They advertised a 
> faster connection if I paid $100 for the modem.  But when it matters, it 
> is actually slower.  Much slower.  I wonder if there is a lawsuit waiting 
> to happen.

They could argue that you can't setup your computer like a server. When you're 
filesharing technically your computer is also a server.

Have you tried switching the ports your client uses? Or does Rogers scan all 
ports for bittorrent traffic.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list