m$ to Google: do not dare take away from us what isn't ours
Peter
plp-ysDPMY98cNQDDBjDh4tngg at public.gmane.org
Sat Jul 15 21:13:40 UTC 2006
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> Brandon Sandrowicz wrote:
>
>> Is it any wonder that you get anti-competitive statements coming out of
>> the guy they got from Walmart? It's like he's inviting another anti-trust
>> trial, "We won't allow anyone to challenge us. We are the only ones
>> allowed to have enterprise search." I think he also wins the drama queen
>> award for the "take food off our plate" analogy. It's not like Microsoft
>> will die on the vine if they lose enterprise search, or (god forbid) have
>> to *share* the space with another competitor or two.
>
> It's interesting to see MS switch their "mortal enemy" focus from Linux to
> Google. Does this mean that they believe their battles with open source to
> be:
> 1) Won (so let's move on to the next victim)
> 2) Unwinable (so the shift to Google is a diversion and/or softer target)
> 3) A long term battle of attrition (so a new rallying point is needed for
> partners and shareholders with ADD)
It's much simpler: they think that they are strong enough to fight on
two fronts. Losers.
Peter
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list