More than half of SCO's claims are dismissed before trial

[Colin McGregor]

--- Evan Leibovitch <evan-ieNeDk6JonTYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> For those of you still following this case:
> 
>
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=190200070

It is all good, if sick fun to watch SCO
self-destruct.  

Further we need to keep in mind that the claims that
were dismissed were ones where SCO provided ZERO
evidence that IBM had done something wrong. Of the
remaining claims, the claims appear to this non-lawyer
to be total @#$% but at least SCO has offered
something (anything) to back up the claim that IBM has
done something wrong.

I do have a new SCO T-shirt with some of their legal
claims that I plan to sell for $$$ after SCO is turned
into a smoking crater as a leason to others :-) . My
only question is who will launch the last airstrike
(legal strike?) against SCO? IBM? Red Hat? Novell?
Autozone? SCO shareholders? Someone SCO has not sued
yet? :-) .

Colin McGregor

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml