State of the art spam control?

[Phillip Qin]

I think everyone has his favourite. I switched from spamassassin to dspam
and it uses similar approach as mozilla's TB does.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org [mailto:owner-tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Sent: February 23, 2006 10:29 AM
To: tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [TLUG]: State of the art spam control?

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 05:39:17AM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> 
> In the latest Linux Weekly News, the grumpy editor reviews multiple
> Bayesian spam filters.  Spamassassin still wins, kind of.

When I switched from spamassassin to bogofilter, the amount of spam that
made it to my inbox was drastically reduced.  It does need training of
course, and the database does take some disk space, but I am not going
back to spam assassin.  There is just no comparison.

Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml

!DSPAM:43fdd4c3106645210641494!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20060223/bd21def0/attachment.html>