Anybody has successful experience with Slackware 10.2 with rp-pppoe 3.5 on Sympatico?

[frankpeng-VsqqI1RANlHk1uMJSBkQmQ at public.gmane.org]

I got it.

The one I was using is a new one. It is 3.7. I found an old one, 3.5 
and installed it. Now it's working.

Thank you anyways!

Frank Peng

-----Original Message-----
From: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org>
To: tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org
Sent: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:20:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [TLUG]: Anybody has successful experience with Slackware 
10.2 with rp-pppoe 3.5 on Sympatico?

   On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:27:24AM -0500, frankpeng-VsqqI1RANlHk1uMJSBkQmQ at public.gmane.org 
wrote:
> Hi,guys!
>
> I compiled my slacware 10.2 kernel and installed rp-pppoe 3.5. After 
I
pppoe-start, it says Connected!
> But it screwed up the TCP-IP and the routing stuff, and it won;t ping 
the name
server 204.101.251.1, either. I cannot ping 127.0.0.1 and other local 
hosts. If
I do not pppoe-start, I can ping localhost and other host.

If you can't ping 127.0.0.1, you better fix your network setup first.
Until that works, nothing will work right.

> ifconfig is ok, ppp0,lo, eth0 and eth1 showing up there.
> When I route
> it takes a long time to show up
> 69.x.y.z(the ppp0's ip) *  255.255.255.0   UH ...
> localnet                                               U
> localloop                                              U
> default                                                U

What does 'route -n' show?

> There is no UG.

pppd should add the gateway if you have defaultroute option enabled in
the ppp config.

> I never understood route table completely.
> The rp-pppoe documents says, it could be my old kernel. This is not 
the case,
my kernel is 2.4.31.
> The documents says feed the eth1 a fake it such as 10.0.0.1 netmask
255.255.255.0. I did that. It did not work.
> I remember, the eth1 could be 0.0.0.0 and mask 255.255.255.0

The interface you run pppoe on should not have any ip configuration at
all.

> I lived with Slackware and rp-ppp for many years and I never got 
problem.
Probally I should get an older rp-pppoe?
>
> My kernel is nothing new. I am just so greedy to utilize the memory. 
I has 1G
memory and the kernel show only 900M. So I configured the kernel to 
memory 4G
and HIGHMEM=y. After I got the new kernel I have 1G memory.

Yeah linux has always been limited to 900M ram on i386 if you didn't
enable the highmem option.

> I cannot remember how I got it work before. Probally it was Slackware 
10.0.
Now it is 10.2.
>
> The rp-pppoe guy said, he made the rp-ppppoe on FreeBSD. That is the 
closest
to Slackware.

In configuration style they are close.  Nothing else is.  For everything
else slackware is just like every other linux distribution.

> I will look for older rp-pppoe and a newer Slackware, if you had a 
success
story on the same environment, please give me a click. Thanks a lot!

I think you just have to sort out your network configuration.

Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml


___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml