Dig camera

Sy Ali sy1234-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sun Dec 24 04:26:03 UTC 2006


On 12/21/06, John McGregor <mr.mcgregor-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Here are reviews of each camera by CNET:
> http://www.cnet.com.au/digitalcameras/cameras/0,239036184,240092304,00.htm
> http://www.cnet.com.au/digitalcameras/cameras/0,239036184,240090746,00.htm?ref=search
>
> On the face of it, it looks like the Kodak is the better camera for the
> money. You should also be aware that camera companies often offer sales
> people incentives to push their products over the competition and
> because of this, "suggestions" from the sales droids should be discounted.

After having doing some more thinking on this topic recently.. I will
not look at a camera unless it has an open RAW format and has an
excellent anti-shake feature.

And it's be nice to be waterproof.. but that's a pipe dream for the
higher-end cameras.

/me pats his OptioWP
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list