Business case for switching to Linux
Christopher Browne
cbbrowne-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Tue Apr 11 01:52:56 UTC 2006
On 4/10/06, John Van Ostrand <john-Da48MpWaEp0CzWx7n4ubxQ at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> It really depends on the system and the administrator. A re-install of a
> complex system that would take days to reconfigure may be more of a
> business hit than the hour to fix it.
The only reason for it to be "acceptable" to get stuck with this is if
you have a totally unmaintainable system that is actually impossible
to reinstall.
If we had such a problem with a database server, you can bet it'll be
*toast*, down to reimaging from scratch. It's not that hard.
And what you really want with your systems is the ability to rebuild
from scratch, *easily*. See <http://www.infrastructures.org/>; the
folks in that organization find it unacceptable if they can't rebuild
a server *from scratch* in 20 minutes.
If anything, Linux should be easier than the "traditional Unixes" to
do this with.
--
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/linux.html
"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him
absolutely no good." -- Samuel Johnson, lexicographer (1709-1784)
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list