SPAM-LOW: Re:Semi-OT: Database for "average" users
Ilya Palagin
tux-4CS0UopE6WdBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Tue May 3 22:06:10 UTC 2005
Quoting Andrew Hammond <ahammond-swQf4SbcV9C7WVzo/KQ3Mw at public.gmane.org>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ilya Palagin wrote:
>>> Here here!!! I totally agree. MySQL is the classic example of "its gonna
>>> be great someday". And when that day comes cool! For now I do use it but
>>> only for simple things. Can't wait until it finally has "views" which
>>> will
>>> be the coming version and that will finally make it somewhat useful! Sure
>>
>> You don't need to wait, it's already great - tons of web applications, for
>> example, come with MySQL in mind :-)
>
> Tons of applications come with Windows in mind. That doesn't make it great.
>
> Tacking on more features when they still haven't solved the fundamental
> problems of data integrity is somewhere between comedic and tragic.
> Until MySQL can conform to standard handling of the basics (NULLs for
> example, http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html has a semi-canonical
> list), it will remain a toy. Applications based on it are almost
Well, like any other subject, Windows and MySQL are good in a proper
context. Windows is great for making money, MySQL advantage is
mentioned below.
> impossible to port away from it because it fails to conform to SQL in
> numerous critical areas. Advocating it for a platform is an excellent
> way to demonstrate ignorance of everything related to the subject of
> databases. Choosing it for a platform amounts to demonstrable incompetence.
>
> Furthermore, MySQL also has numerous ongoing licensing issues. It is NOT
> free outside of strictly non-commercial environments. MySQL AB's
> definition of "distribute" doesn't appear to be inline with pretty much
> everyone else's on the planet, and lawyer time is even more not free. I
> am continually amazed by the outright stupidity of people who choose
> MySQL over Postgres when Postgres is both completely unencumbered (ie.
> BSD license) and obviously technically superior.
Except for performance?
>
> And don't even get me started about MySQL's locking issues.
>
> - --
> Andrew Hammond 416-673-4138 ahammond-swQf4SbcV9C7WVzo/KQ3Mw at public.gmane.org
> Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
> CB83 2838 4B67 D40F D086 3568 81FC E7E5 27AF 4A9A
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFCd+6Jgfzn5SevSpoRApBsAKDHoitKXzkT/Aq+M+ZDnMgWVc1JvwCgg1wE
> ysIDaOKU97cXJjxukszlnYM=
> =i1N4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list