Sympatico AUP
James Knott
james.knott-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org
Tue Jul 5 22:25:10 UTC 2005
Andrew Hammond wrote:
> Sure they'll notice excessive usage. And last I checked, Rogers had two
> active network scanners looking for open mail, news and web ports. You
> should be able to find their IPs with a quick google. I used to get
> scanned at least once a week.
One nice thing about udp based vpn's, is that they're hard to scan for.
A non-responding upd port looks exactly like one that's blocked by a
firewall, that is no response whatsoever.
>
> I happen to agree with their position. If you want to run servers, lease
> a box in co-lo or buy a service package which supports it.
I fully support the ban on public servers, as they may generate
excessive traffic. But what about ssh or vpn access to one's network?
Is that in fact a "server"?
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list