Another dead power supply

John Macdonald john-Z7w/En0MP3xWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
Tue Dec 6 21:07:14 UTC 2005


On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:19:34PM +0200, Peter wrote:
> You could introduce some metrics using f.ex. (power * known_life)/price, 
> otherwise it's comparing apples with prunes. A brand name PSU would have 
> to run 4 times longer than a no name cheap one on account of the price 
> difference alone. That is equivalent to roughly being twice as large or 
> running 20 degrees (Celsius) cooler (imagine the fans this requires, 
> given standard PSU size).

You're assuming that both power supplies cause no damage when
they fail.  If the no name supply destroys your motherboard
or disk when it fails, then the brand name supply only has to
last a small fraction of the time to be a bargain.  Even with
a clean failure, if you put any value on having your computer
available and on the cost of your time to get a replacement
power supply and install it, the brand name supply is also
still a cheaper deal if it lasts a little while longer.

-- 
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml





More information about the Legacy mailing list