bogofilter satisfaction report

[JoeHill]

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:12:25 -0400
Lennart Sorensen disseminated the following:

> > ...so, it classified the mail as 'ham', but nonetheless gave it a very high
> > score.
> 
> That is a VERY small score.
> 
> 5.8592e-13 == 5.8592 * 10^-13 = 0.00000000000058592
> 
> Low enough for you? :)

Heh. Me look stupid...again. Oh well, I'm gettin' used to it.
 
> So almost certainly your procmail is doing something wrong with the
> return code of bogofilter or you have the wrong arguments on bogofilter.

Yep. I forgot to take Peter's advice and use the *second* Procmail recipe given
in the manpage, I was still using this one:

:0HB:
* ? bogofilter
spam

I'm now using the second one (without the -u for now), and it seems to be
working (your message got through, eh?).

Many thanks, guys. 

-- 
JoeHill / RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
12:17:57 up 67 days, 13:26, 7 users, load average: 1.53, 1.33, 1.29
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding." -- John Kenneth Galbraith
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml