Routing question -- multiple gateway setup?

Robert Brockway robert-5LEc/6Zm6xCUd8a0hrldnti2O/JbrIOy at public.gmane.org
Mon Aug 23 05:26:09 UTC 2004


On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Robert Brockway wrote:

> Since most traffic thesee days goes through a proxy-cache one option is to

That was badly worded.  I meant most traffic these days is of a type that
_could_ go through a proxy-cache (like squid), eg http.  Thus by only load
balancing tcp/80 you get most of the traffic balanced.

Also, I did not experiment heavily with how well iproute2 copes with link
drops.  IIRC I don't think it was dropping routes when interfaces went
down so some sort of management script may still be needed.  I also found
the multiple routing tables sometimes got out of sync with what the ip
utility was showing.  I had to reboot the test box to clear this up.  This
did not inspire confidence and was part of the reason I dropped the
project in favour of a simpler solution.

Rob

-- 
Robert Brockway B.Sc. email: robert-5LEc/6Zm6xCUd8a0hrldnti2O/JbrIOy at public.gmane.org, rbrockway-cFo9iiqjkw8eIZ0/mPfg9Q at public.gmane.org
Linux counter project ID #16440 (http://counter.li.org)
"The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens" -Baha'u'llah
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml





More information about the Legacy mailing list