sad sad sad

[James Knott]

Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:06:38AM -0400, Justin Zygmont wrote:
>>
>>>it's been a sad day today, my 386 just breathed it's last.  In memory of
>>>"the good days" when 100MB drives were monsters, I saved the 386sx bios,
>>>dip chips (ram), and the VLSI chipset.  If only electronics could speak,
>>>the things that motherboard could tell.  An expensive and often
>>>envied CPU in it's hayday, 386sx-16 managed to see MS and DR-DOS, SCO
>>>UNIX, and slackware linux before it's dying day.  386 was almost 14.
>>
>>I never admired the 386SX, only the DX.  Chopping of half the data bus
>>of a a poor defenseless 386 just seemed cruel, all to satisfy the
>>marketing weenies. :)
> 
> 
> They were pin-compatible with late model 286s which meant they could get
> them to market quickly (by shoving them in 286 boards & makign sure the
> board didn't collapse under the higher clockspeed :)  I'm not sure if
> anyone actually upgraded a 286 to a 386SX (ie, replacing the chip) but it
> was supposed to be possible.

I seem to recall some adapter boards, to fit a 386 into a 286.



--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml