sad sad sad

Robert Brockway robert-5LEc/6Zm6xCUd8a0hrldnti2O/JbrIOy at public.gmane.org
Mon Oct 20 22:15:59 UTC 2003


On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Justin Zygmont wrote:

> > They were pin-compatible with late model 286s which meant they could get
> > them to market quickly (by shoving them in 286 boards & makign sure the
> > board didn't collapse under the higher clockspeed :)  I'm not sure if
> > anyone actually upgraded a 286 to a 386SX (ie, replacing the chip) but it
> > was supposed to be possible.
>
> not very likely, many boards back then weren't even socketed.  sx's were a
> great value for the price.

Hehehe :)  How were the 286s afixed to the board?  Not anything as crude
as solder I hope :)  Thinking back they seemed to be as integrated as any
other component (the 386SX board I had for a while certainly was).

Rob

-- 
Robert Brockway B.Sc. email: robert-5LEc/6Zm6xCUd8a0hrldnti2O/JbrIOy at public.gmane.org, zzbrock at uqconnect.net
Linux counter project ID #16440 (http://counter.li.org)
"The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens" -Baha'u'llah
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml





More information about the Legacy mailing list