sad sad sad
Robert Brockway
robert-5LEc/6Zm6xCUd8a0hrldnti2O/JbrIOy at public.gmane.org
Mon Oct 20 22:15:59 UTC 2003
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> > They were pin-compatible with late model 286s which meant they could get
> > them to market quickly (by shoving them in 286 boards & makign sure the
> > board didn't collapse under the higher clockspeed :) I'm not sure if
> > anyone actually upgraded a 286 to a 386SX (ie, replacing the chip) but it
> > was supposed to be possible.
>
> not very likely, many boards back then weren't even socketed. sx's were a
> great value for the price.
Hehehe :) How were the 286s afixed to the board? Not anything as crude
as solder I hope :) Thinking back they seemed to be as integrated as any
other component (the 386SX board I had for a while certainly was).
Rob
--
Robert Brockway B.Sc. email: robert-5LEc/6Zm6xCUd8a0hrldnti2O/JbrIOy at public.gmane.org, zzbrock at uqconnect.net
Linux counter project ID #16440 (http://counter.li.org)
"The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens" -Baha'u'llah
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list