list check

[Emir Alikadic]

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, (PLP) Peter L. Peres <plp-ysDPMY98cNQDDBjDh4tngg at public.gmane.org> wrote:

PLP> 
PLP> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
PLP> 
PLP> > Therefore you have no proof that I'm the only subscriber that received
PLP> > spam through the list.
PLP> 
PLP> No, but I have circumstantial proof of lack of complaints by anybody else
PLP> on the list about getting spam from the list during the last month or so
PLP> at least. Sorry for being picky but I'm tuning my spam filter by hand and
PLP> I take a keen interest in spam and headers.

So do I, Peter.  I have Postfix + Procmail + SpamAssassin + Vipul's Razor set
and I *still* get SPAM from tlug.  I think you're all unfairly attacking Ralph
for bringing up this issue.

Furthermore, I think your suggestion to tune your SPAM filters is ridiculous:
it just deals with the symptoms and leaves the real problem untackled.  Don't
you think we should secure the server or do you really think we should just
all implement individual filtering schemes?
-- 
"If there's anything more important than my ego around,
 I want it caught and shot now."    [Zaphod Beeblebrox]

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml