Microsoft Must be held accountable.
Anton Markov
anton-F0u+EriZ6ihBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Fri Oct 10 21:56:08 UTC 2003
JoeHill,
I think you are getting a little carried away here. You are going way
overboard and leaving the realm of criticism. Here is how I see it:
Even though I don't like Microsoft software, I personally have nothing
against the company or Bill Gates. Here is why:
Microsoft makes a product for a particular market - the novice to
everyday computer user. It is the ease of use of Microsoft Windows that
made the internet revolution possible (I know that most of the servers
are *nix, but what's the point of having servers if no one can access
the site?) Microsoft is a multi-trillion dollar corporation that
creates tens of thousands of jobs. It is no more or less evil than
McDonalds or GM. They are certainly not as bad as the government which
imposes its monopoly(s) with guns and laws.
That doesn't mean that Windows is a good piece of software. However,
there is a large market of people who's needs are satisfied by Windows.
For these people it's a good piece of software. Let it be (sort of).
Linux and Windows fill their own niches in the computer OS market. The
real problem is that Windows is so insecure that it causes problems for
not only its users, but all other users of the internet. Worse yet,
Microsoft isn't in a big hurry to fix it.
The only way to fix this problem is to make Microsoft *want* to fix it.
I say *want*, because the minute we *force* a business to modify its
practices it is called communism or fascism, which ever you prefer to
call it.
The real way to make a business change it's policies is to use the rules
of "supply and demand". This doesn't mean "Demand the supply", it means
"The demand creates the supply". In other words, if the consumers want
something bad enough, someone will always come along and build a
business that fills that gap. Microsoft was built by allowing ordinary
people to use a computer with ease. Linux is becoming more popular as
people want more stable and secure computing.
Therefore, the solution to this problem and many more problems in
today's society (including the "Windows Refund" issue discussed some
weeks ago) is education. Not the "1+1=2" and "Canada became a country
in 1867" crap, but education about choices. People need to know that
there is more than one operating system out there, that there are more
ways to succeed in life than "go to school and get a safe secure job", etc.
A few days ago my Computer Science teacher had me do a presentation on
Linux for the class (no bonus marks or anything). I had some of my
classmates install and use Redhat. They where surprised at how easy it
was to use. At least two people in my class are now considering getting
Linux on their next computer. They now know that there are options to
Windoss. This 'lesson' part of the curriculum or anything. That is the
power of education and knowledge rather than blind protests, complaints,
or regulations.
Sorry this was so long, but I found that I have a lot to say once I
started writing. Thanks for reading it all.
Anton
JoeHill wrote:
> But shouldn't MS be held responsible for the ridiculous ease with which
> these people can compromise Windows software?
>
> And the only way to get their attention is to make Windows more
> difficult to use on the 'net, ie. find a way to identify the machines
> and shut them out.
>
> I already block all mail from Outlook unless it is from a known person
> or list, and there are ways to make websites inaccessible to IE (there
> must be, if there are ways to do the reverse), which I am going to look
> into.
>
--
Anton Markov <("anton" + "@" + "truxtar" + "." + "com")>
GnuPGP Key fingerprint =
5546 A6E2 1FFB 9BB8 15C3 CE34 46B7 8D93 3AD1 44B4
"The difference between insanity and genius is measured only by success."
- Some bad guy from 007
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20031010/a8a81b36/attachment.sig>
More information about the Legacy
mailing list