GUI

[Taavi Burns]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 11:32:53AM -0500, Tim Writer wrote:
> Yes, the WPS was arguably better integrated than desktops available for Linux
> (olwm, twm, fvwm) at that time but I'm not convinced that OS/2 could do more.
> I ran OS/2 2.0 and Linux (SLS w/ kernel 0.98) on a 486/33 w/ 8MB RAM.  Linux

I believe that everyone referring to OS/2 being wonderful post 1995 would be
referring to OS/2 Warp 3 (or one of its variants).  In a move totally unlike
anything M$ has ever done, Warp 3 took less RAM and ran faster than OS/2 2.x.
(I think it did use more disk, though)


-- 
taa
/*eof*/
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml