SCO has valid case
Chris Keelan
rufmetal-MwcKTmeKVNQ at public.gmane.org
Fri Nov 7 03:34:30 UTC 2003
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:16:59 -0500
cbbrowne-HInyCGIudOg at public.gmane.org wrote:
> > No matter which way they turn, they're fsck-ed.
>
> Well, there's ONE "way out," namely for them to be "right" about all
> of their claims, or at least, for the relevant court to see things
> that way. Which is less impossible than we'd like it to be :-(.
I'm scared about the court's perceptions as well, but as for the
strength of SCO's case: why are they acting as if they don't even
believe the allegations?
Their response to IBM's Motion to Compel was *lame*. Hope the judge
sees it that way.
~ C
--
gpg pubkey fingerprint:
100E A98E E143 C326 547C A207 A704 F673 8B4E A754
****
"There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary
and those who don't."
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list