SCO has valid case

Chris Keelan rufmetal-MwcKTmeKVNQ at public.gmane.org
Fri Nov 7 03:34:30 UTC 2003


On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:16:59 -0500
cbbrowne-HInyCGIudOg at public.gmane.org wrote:

> > No matter which way they turn, they're fsck-ed.
> 
> Well, there's ONE "way out," namely for them to be "right" about all
> of their claims, or at least, for the relevant court to see things
> that way.  Which is less impossible than we'd like it to be :-(.

I'm scared about the court's perceptions as well, but as for the
strength of SCO's case: why are they acting as if they don't even
believe the allegations?

Their response to IBM's Motion to Compel was *lame*.  Hope the judge
sees it that way.

~ C

-- 
gpg pubkey fingerprint:
100E A98E E143 C326 547C  A207 A704 F673 8B4E A754
                     ****
"There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary
and those who don't."
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml





More information about the Legacy mailing list