OpenOffice.org Performance
Walter Dnes
waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org
Tue Nov 4 00:35:25 UTC 2003
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 10:10:20PM -0500, cbbrowne-HInyCGIudOg at public.gmane.org wrote
> If you look at what is _actually happening_, there is nothing
> ambiguous about it, except when you use ill-defined terms like
> "running GNOME" to describe it.
>
> What you are _truly_ doing is "running X," along with some set of
> libraries and applications in addition to some window manager that may
> or may not have any kind of association with any of these projects.
>
> - KDE is not a window manager, as is quite well documented by that project.
> - GNOME is not a window manager, as is rather less well documented.
>
> Both are far and away best described as "application frameworks."
I deliberately used the word "desktop", not "window manager". The
usual situation is...
- X at lowest level
- window manager on top of X
- optional "desktop" on top of the window manager; cutsie icons strewn
all over, and ooey-gui, touchy-feely interaction.
- actual applications that do the work that you bought your computer
to do
In my personal experience, a 433 or 450 mhz machine with 128 megs of
RAM is *PAINFULLY* slow with an optional KDE or GNOME desktop running.
Remove the "desktop", and the programs run reasonably fast.
I don't use the word "application framework", because that includes
some necessary libraries that applications use, as well as all eye-candy
on the desktop.
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org>
Email users are divided into two classes;
1) Those who have effective spam-blocking
2) Those who wish they did
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list