OT: keyboard layouts
Henry Spencer
henry-lqW1N6Cllo0sV2N9l4h3zg at public.gmane.org
Sat Dec 13 23:57:47 UTC 2003
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Taavi Burns wrote:
> > ...Almost all the "we should switch"
> > arguments also support "switch to Maltron, not Dvorak".
>
> Indeed, I see that point. Given that Maltron uses the basic qwerty
> letter layout...
Uh, come again? It most certainly doesn't. The home row, for example,
is ANISF DTHOR, with E on the left thumb and space on the right thumb.
Some Maltron keyboards do come with a Qwerty mode as well, but that's
explicitly a compatibility kludge. (Note, keyboards shaped vaguely like
the Maltron keyboard are not necessarily Maltron keyboards.)
> Question: who made the Maltron such that it's that much superior to
> a Dvorak layout? Has anyone tried using the physical Maltron keyboard
> with a Dvorak letter mapping?
Why would you bother? Use the Maltron shape with the Maltron layout.
> > the Dvorak layout; if you could shoehorn some approximation of it into a
> > Qwerty-based physical layout (which I'm unsure of), the result is quite
> > likely to be better than Dvorak.
>
> I'm saying that after looking at a picture of the Maltron keyboard,
> I don't think there's any way to convert a standard keyboard short of
> a hacksaw and soldering iron. The physical metaphor is wrong.
Correct, but that's backwards from what I was suggesting, which is
adapting the Maltron layout to the standard physical shape. I'm not sure
it is reasonably possible, mind you, because of the thumb problem.
> > Preferably a factor of ten. It has to be at least a factor of two to get
> > people excited. 10% just isn't enough when there are major compatibility
> > issues.
>
> Noting that the compatibility issue is a human one. The machine can
> trivially remap the keyboard's logical layout.
True, but so what? The human issue is a large one, actually a bigger
barrier than a hardware issue would be.
> On a slightly divergent note, I'm still quite perplexed as to why
> having the most commonly typed letter _not_ on the home row is not
> such a performance hit as one would expect.
Note that the most commonly typed *key* is space, which has a whole thumb
dedicated to it in either Qwerty or Dvorak, and is in the home position
for that thumb in Maltron.
That said, yes, E is the commonest letter and it's not in the home row,
but only about one character in every ten is an E, so by itself it does
not make a huge difference. And Qwerty does put it on a strong finger,
and in a location where it's not a long reach. (Maltron's E on the left
thumb is clearly better, mind you...)
> Neverminding that
> the studies you cite say that there's negligible improvement, I'm
> quite curious as to why that is.
Basically, because the Qwerty layout is not a bad one (for an electronic
keyboard -- some of its problems, like the assignment of A and the shifts
to the little fingers, loom larger on manual typewriters), and the
improvements to be had by rearranging it simply aren't huge.
Henry Spencer
henry-lqW1N6Cllo0sV2N9l4h3zg at public.gmane.org
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list